Understand the issue

IHR2019_decentralization 2-3

A few large players dominate much of the online world, but the internet is healthier when it is controlled by many.

Many of the challenges facing the health of the internet today can be traced back to the fact that the most ubiquitous digital products and services are controlled by a handful of players.

In the last year, the debate about this consolidation of power has continued, sharpened and, in some cases, started to grow teeth.

The digital world is dominated by eight American and Chinese companies: Alphabet (Google’s parent company), Alibaba, Amazon, Apple, Baidu, Facebook, Microsoft and Tencent.

These companies and their subsidiaries have outsized control over the internet. They dominate all layers of the digital world, from the search engines, browsers and social media services many of us use daily, to core infrastructure like undersea cables and cloud computing that few of us see. They built their empires by selling our attention to advertisers, disrupting business models and creating new online marketplaces, and designing hardware and software that is now deeply integrated into many of our lives. Their influence is ever-increasing in our private lives and public spaces. Where they misstep, we can experience real harm.

A healthy balance of power in our global internet ecosystem depends on a delicate interplay between governments, companies and civil society. We need effective competition standards and technical interoperability ––between the products of different companies–– to ensure that the internet grows and evolves in ways that accommodate the diverse needs of people around the world.

Fines for breaking antitrust laws like the $5 billion fine that European Union regulators hit Google with in 2018 have not had the effect needed to ensure a balanced and open future.

Many are exploring alternatives to an internet driven by the interests of corporate goliaths on their own. New business models are emerging that seek to distribute control among users, including platform cooperativism and collaborative ownership.

Vibrant communities of innovators are working to create alternatives to centralized systems by upscaling local connectivity, spinning up decentralized projects, protocols and products and even creating independent alternatives to publishing on the big tech platforms.

From the start, the internet has enabled people to challenge authority, upend traditional business models and create greater transparency, openness and accountability. But the disruptive-for-good vision of the internet isn’t something we can take for granted.

Everyone who uses the internet has a stake in its future. From city officials to technical professionals, to tomorrow’s generation of internet users.

For an internet where there is true choice, we need to support products that diversify the market, and laws and policies that protect users and foster healthy competition. We need to join forces and drive citizen action, research and innovation to build a healthier internet.

What matters to you in this issue?

  1. Anonymous

    We know anti-trust laws work, We have experience. Where are our legislators on this issue?

  2. Howard Stone NZ

    All of us who use the internet have a stake in its future.

    Yes, we want a healthy internet today and for the next generations.

    Who decides?
    We can with our voices.
    I live in Christchurch and am so sad for Sri Lanka.
    Still, bad as it can be, Syria and Bashir al Assad is worse.

    We must speak out for that which is good in this world.
    We must speak out because the big companies that drive our internet.
    The Alphabet (Google’s parent company),
    Alibaba, Amazon, Apple, Baidu, Facebook, Microsoft and Tencent.
    These companies test us everyday and take our silence as consent.

    I support real human innovation to maintain a healthy internet
    Go Mozilla...

See Mozilla Community Participation guidelines: [English | Español | Deutsch | Français]. This is a moderated comment space. We will remove comments that are offensive or completely off topic.